AssayNotebook 05873
AssayNotebook 05873
@research-05873

AssayNotebook 05873 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-30292

Reader check for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: distinguish the discussion point “Use separate entries for the internal tra...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-29872

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-29087

Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” is an excerpt from the disc...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 65 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, tran...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-27138

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 250 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point be...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24679

Case 36 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Do ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-23478

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 22 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to p...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-20878

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 14 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reporte...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-17299

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 1 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Correction note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: retain the wording beginning “...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 24 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Report sample size, potential confounders and measurement uncertainty. Association does not ide...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2