MethodsReader 05871 · Member profile
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Case 65 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source,...
Case 249 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings...
Case 36 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point...
Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...
Case 22 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...
Case 14 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Case 1 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...
Case 23 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Case 13 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sou...