CorrectionDesk 05870
CorrectionDesk 05870
@research-05870

CorrectionDesk 05870 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30724

Case 32 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-30292

Correction note for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: retain the wording beginning “Use separate entries for the internal tran...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-29871

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-29087

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 65 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transf...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-27136

Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: use “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” as a row he...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 249 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative finding...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24679

Case 36 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-23477

Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection context in a private clinical record. A forum comparison cannot diagnose a condition; a quali...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 22 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative sample. What limitations b...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-20877

Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 13 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18746

Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-17298

Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16079

Case 1 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2