UnitsCheck 05869 · Member profile

Case 32 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...

Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: “Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction…” is ...

Case 65 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · comparison exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, tran...

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

Case 249 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

Case 35 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...

Case 21 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

Case 13 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

Case 1 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual dec...