EvidenceTable 05854 · Member profile
Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Separate the authors’ interpretation from the…” is an excerpt from the di...
Case 63 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · comparison exercise Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label ...
Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Report effect size, confidence interval an...
Case 247 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · comparison exercise Correction note for “Reference management: distinguis...
Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distingui...
Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…”; the relate...
Case 19 — A correction log for an archive article Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wording beginning “Identif...
Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: “Locate the primary study and confirm that it…” is an excerp...
Case 11 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Exp...
Case 50 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · comparison exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What sho...
Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citat...
Case 11 — A correction log for an archive article A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repair...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...