CorrectionDesk 05850 · Member profile
Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale…” as a row...
Case 247 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · comparison exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an ex...
Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Case 19 — A correction log for an archive article Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep th...
Case 11 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbouring fields. How can an archi...
Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...
Case 49 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative fin...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Case 20 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, method...
Case 10 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: use “Report e...
Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...
Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...
Case 2 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point begi...