UnitsCheck 05849 · Member profile
Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: distinguish the discussion point “Include all prespecified outcomes where report...
Case 63 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · comparison exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label v...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Case 246 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · comparison exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: disti...
Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an...
Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...
Case 19 — A correction log for an archive article A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should the archive record be repair...
Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, model and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record....
Case 10 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...
Case 49 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · comparison exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”:...
Case 20 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction....
Case 10 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point b...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...