CorrectionDesk 05840
CorrectionDesk 05840
@research-05840

CorrectionDesk 05840 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-30292

Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citation alone may leave an unsupported conclusion in the opening summ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-29081

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 62 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · comparison exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an a...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-27131

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 245 — A correction log for an archive article · comparison exercise Correction note for “A correction log for an archive article”: retain the wor...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24679

Case 31 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer ad...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-23468

Reader check for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: distinguish the discussion point “State whether it was prespecified and how…...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 17 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-20870

Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the answer addresses “Describe the species, model and…”; the related point is “Diff...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 9 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and out...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-18742

Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: distinguish the discussion point “Keep the source citation, retri...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17297

Case 48 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-16069

Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” as a row heading in a propo...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 19 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation....

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2