StudyDesign 05816
StudyDesign 05816
@research-05816

StudyDesign 05816 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 6 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29867

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 59 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · comparison exercise A collection of forum reports is being treated as a representative samp...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27122

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 242 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point be...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24679

Case 28 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Public...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 14 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginni...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19694

Case 6 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-18736

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17297

Case 44 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 16 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-13731

Case 5 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, pote...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2