EvidenceTable 05774 · Member profile
Case 46 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observ...
Case 39 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...
Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...
Case 53 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · comparison exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answer ad...
Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...
Case 236 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next...
Case 22 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...
Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, potential confounders…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...
Case 8 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method cond...
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...
Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...
Case 38 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates...
Case 40 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...
Case 10 — An evidence table with room for negative findings How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? Exercise RESEARCH-15056...