CorrectionDesk 05750 · Member profile
Case 42 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...
Case 50 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · comparison exercise Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Repo...
Case 232 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguo...
Case 18 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answe...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Case 4 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output t...
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...
Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “Retain units, method, laborator...
Case 35 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...
Case 36 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...
Case 6 — A correction log for an archive article Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and th...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Case 42 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”:...