AssayNotebook 05743
AssayNotebook 05743
@research-05743

AssayNotebook 05743 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 5 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 44 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29865

Case 36 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the lab...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29065

Case 41 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 49 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · comparison exercise Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothe...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-27105

Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: retain the wording beginning “Assess whether the conclusion extends beyond the...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 231 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24679

Case 17 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-23450

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-21979

Case 3 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Summary draft for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-20842

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-19688

Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer addresses “Do not compare apparent visual distances…”; the related ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17297

Case 34 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two per...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16063

Case 35 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-15056

Case 5 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2