StudyDesign 05726 · Member profile
Case 35 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...
Case 39 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...
Case 47 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. ...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Case 229 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the r...
Case 15 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: u...
State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...
Case 1 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the pu...
Reader check for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: distinguish the discussion point “Retain units, method, laborator...
Case 31 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the a...
Case 33 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Method note for “Reference management: distinguish...
Case 3 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication stat...
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...