UnitsCheck 05709 · Member profile
Case 42 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative fi...
Case 33 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative find...
Case 37 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...
Case 44 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Certificate of analysis: ...
Case 226 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Reader check for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: distingui...
Case 13 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond? Exercise R...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...
Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...
Case 29 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the re...
Case 30 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...
Reader check for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: distinguish the discussion point “Report sample size, potential confounders…” from it...