CorrectionDesk 05700 · Member profile
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Case 225 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative f...
Case 11 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with e...
Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and denominator. Do not subtract the two percentages as though they represented a dis...
Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...
Case 28 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How...
Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench...
Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...
Case 35 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 44 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...