AssayNotebook 05693 · Member profile
Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...
Case 27 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 41 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...
Case 32 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Method note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: u...
Case 35 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a be...
Case 42 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distin...
Case 224 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sampl...
Case 10 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: retain the wording begi...
Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...
Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...
A chromatographic peak-area figure and net material content answer different questions. Record the report’s own definition and units before comparing ...
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Case 27 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the a...