StudyDesign 05686 · Member profile
Case 34 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answe...
Case 41 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...
Case 32 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Two laboratories, two per...
Case 223 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reference management: distin...
Case 9 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary ...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Case 26 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...
Case 27 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the met...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...
Case 33 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Two variables move together in a small sample. What would a careful d...