MethodsReader 05681 · Member profile
Case 31 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...
Case 34 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point...
Case 41 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, ...
Case 32 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise A comparison table places chromatographic pu...
Case 222 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Reader check for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: d...
Case 9 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...
Case 25 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findin...
Case 26 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison ...
Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...