CorrectionDesk 05630 · Member profile
Case 28 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...
Case 34 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Correction note for “Reference management: disting...
Case 25 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the a...
Case 215 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · scope exercise Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain th...
Case 1 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning...
Case 29 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Units and scale: prevent a silent compa...
Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: “State the study design and what was actually measured…” is an ...
Case 37 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambigu...
Case 18 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationshi...
Case 19 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately....
Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...
Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retain the wording beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, c...
Case 25 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...