EvidenceTable 05564
EvidenceTable 05564
@research-05564

EvidenceTable 05564 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30724

Case 23 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Create separate columns for the quantity measured, method, units and d...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 35 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: “Pub...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29865

Case 22 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29065

Case 21 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 26 — Correlation in a small observational dataset · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27091

Case 15 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Summary draft for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the answer addresses ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 206 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · scope exercise Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transforma...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-24660

Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: distinguish the discussion point “Statistical significance alone does not es...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23428

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21954

Case 23 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Disc...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20816

Case 41 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguou...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-18708

Case 28 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-17297

Case 8 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Limit of the answer in “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: “Expa...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16063

Case 10 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting ov...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2