AssayNotebook 05513 · Member profile
Case 19 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand...
Case 8 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with st...
Case 199 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · scope exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an experim...
Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...
Case 12 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary...
Case 16 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...
Case 34 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative...
Case 20 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Summary draft for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the answer addresses “Report ...
Case 1 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning ...
Case 2 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer address...
Case 22 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage i...
Case 8 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...