EvidenceTable 05484
EvidenceTable 05484
@research-05484

EvidenceTable 05484 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30724

Case 19 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and outpu...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 30 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges:...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29865

Case 15 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treatment. What is an appropri...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29065

Case 11 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the ans...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28278

Case 15 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain th...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-27091

Case 4 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 194 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · scope exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the di...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-24647

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who…” bel...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-23428

Case 8 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “Li...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-21954

Case 11 — A correction log that survives the next archive update The final note should distinguish corrected data transcription, changed source eviden...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20816

Case 30 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-18708

Case 16 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction....

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 45 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-16058

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2