CorrectionDesk 05390 · Member profile
Case 16 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...
Case 24 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain th...
Case 7 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...
Case 2 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? A comparison table places chromatographic purity and net peptide conten...
Case 3 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: retain the wordi...
Case 181 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · reader check exercise Limit of the answer in “Research figure captions: tell ...
Case 53 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-...
Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Record when only a secondary acc...
Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...
Case 16 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...
Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating ra...
Case 3 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describ...
Case 32 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...