StudyDesign 05356 · Member profile
Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: retain the...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...
Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: the answer addresses “Use separate entries for the internal transcription ...
Case 47 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · source wording exercise Correction note for “Two laboratories, two p...
Case 176 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · reader check exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”...
Case 48 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates...
Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion explicitly and retain the original values. Do not compare apparent visual dista...
Case 12 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the archive respond? Exercise R...
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...
Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...
Case 27 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translatio...
Case 37 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise A value has been quoted without units, assay meth...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...