AssayNotebook 05343
AssayNotebook 05343
@research-05343

AssayNotebook 05343 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 22 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”:...

3 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29865

Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? E...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28276

Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 45 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise Reader check for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 174 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · reader check exercise Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: th...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 46 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log that survives the next ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-23404

Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Readers who saved the earlier version should be able to understand ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-21939

Summary draft for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the answer addresses “The reader should be able to see what was…”;...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20816

Case 10 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitation...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-19594

Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” belongs to th...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18698

Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. A conversion or interpretation needs a documented basis; it should not silently...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 25 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Correction note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertai...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 35 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: wha...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-14962

Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguish the discussion point “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” f...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2