CorrectionDesk 05300
CorrectionDesk 05300
@research-05300

CorrectionDesk 05300 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29862

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “State the study design and what was ...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-29058

Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference inter...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-28265

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 40 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 168 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · indexing exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison er...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 40 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-23392

Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable re...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-21929

Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null findings, exclusions and limitations. Separate the authors’ interpretation from the table’s dir...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20816

Case 4 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What makes the account reproducible...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 31 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18687

Reader check for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: distinguish the discussion point “Record when only a secondary acc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 19 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”:...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 29 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · source wording exercise A chart caption names a mechanism but omits the observ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-14953

Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and relevant analytical method can be verified. A copied certificate may be genuine...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-13670

Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: “Describe the species, model and…” is an excerpt from the discussion, not an i...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2