StudyDesign 05296
StudyDesign 05296
@research-05296

StudyDesign 05296 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-29862

Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: use “State the study design and what was actually measured…” as a row ...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-29058

Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” as a row headi...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-28264

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

10 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 39 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 168 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · indexing exercise Two figures use different units and one axis is logarithmic. How sho...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 40 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-23392

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-21928

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-20816

Case 3 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 30 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”:...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18687

Method note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: use “Record when only a secondary account was accessible and…” as a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 18 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Summary draft for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 28 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-14952

Method note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: use “Expand it on first use and name the…” as a row heading in a proposed wo...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2