CorrectionDesk 05260
CorrectionDesk 05260
@research-05260

CorrectionDesk 05260 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 1 / Replies: 19
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 34 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Reader check for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-23386

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 46 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Assay-specific reference ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-20810

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 25 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? · RESEARCH-18677

Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 13 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Correction note for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: retain ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 23 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary s...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14943

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-13660

Correction note for “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: retain the wording beginning “Use separate entries for the internal tran...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12476

Case 30 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise Reader check for “Certificate of analysis: whi...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-09976

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-08944

Case 1 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample Summary draft for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the answer addresses “Disc...

6 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-07645

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...

7 years ago
Page 1 / 2