CorrectionDesk 05190
CorrectionDesk 05190
@research-05190

CorrectionDesk 05190 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 12 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the ans...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 45 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · source wording exercise A reagent dossier contains a summary purity pe...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-29040

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · RESEARCH-28246

Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 25 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Clarification for “A correction log that survives the next ...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 153 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · indexing exercise Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 24 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-23371

Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 36 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Retractions and expressions of concer...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-20790

Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “State the study design and what was actually m...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 15 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-18654

Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the point beginning “State the study design and what was actually me...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-17292

Case 3 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: retain the wording beginni...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 13 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-14931

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2