CorrectionDesk 05180 · Member profile
Case 9 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point be...
Case 12 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail t...
Case 44 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · source wording exercise The same abbreviation has different meanings in neighbourin...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...
Case 23 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving ...
Case 151 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · indexing exercise Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish pr...
Case 23 — Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result? Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a r...
Case 35 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Two results were collected years apart with unknown method changes. What...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
Case 14 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together A table has been copied into a new format without its source or transformat...
Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...
Case 2 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origin...
Case 11 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The corrected summary can be useful without a clinical promise: model, method...