CorrectionDesk 05170
CorrectionDesk 05170
@research-05170

CorrectionDesk 05170 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 2 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 43 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-29036

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-ge...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-28239

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 22 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? Ask whether the sample identifier, issuing laboratory, report date and r...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 150 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · indexing exercise Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Des...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 22 — A correction log that survives the next archive update A archive table has a transcription error in a unit label. A later publisher notice a...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-23367

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Locate the primary study and confirm that i...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 33 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-20787

Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. A review article can help locate sources, but it is not a substitute for...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 12 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: “State...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-18649

Proposed correction: documentation supplied; method and sample linkage incomplete. Add a dated update if verifiable primary material later resolves th...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 10 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation....

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-14925

Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-13638

Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2