CorrectionDesk 05160
CorrectionDesk 05160
@research-05160

CorrectionDesk 05160 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 25
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 42 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise A table has been copied into a new format without...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-29036

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · RESEARCH-28236

Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 20 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the answer addresses “Explain t...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 148 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · indexing exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty expl...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 20 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with s...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A correction log for an archive article · RESEARCH-23365

Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Keep the correction visible to readers who may have…” belongs to the...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 32 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reference management: distingui...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-20783

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 11 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Clinical questions in an archive discussion · RESEARCH-18647

Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Explain the study’s scope and limitations without…” belongs to t...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Correlation in a small observational dataset · RESEARCH-17287

Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, potential confounders…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 9 — Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? A reagent dossier contains a summary purity percentage but not the method...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-14924

Method note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: use “State whether it was prespecified and how…” as a row heading in a propos...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-13638

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2