MethodsReader 05131
MethodsReader 05131
@research-05131

MethodsReader 05131 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 21
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-28227

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 16 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive Summary draft for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the answer ad...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 144 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · correction exercise Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison er...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 16 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Method note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output to...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 28 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Animal evidence and the limits of translation · RESEARCH-20774

Method note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: use “Describe the species, model and…” as a row heading in a proposed working record....

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 7 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources A review cites another review for a claim about an experiment. How can the ev...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-18644

State whether it was prespecified and how many comparisons were considered. Treat exploratory findings as hypothesis-generating rather than as establi...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-17280

Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-reference for alternate meanings rather than assuming that every histor...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 4 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Summary draft for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the answer a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-14919

Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-13628

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-12476

Case 12 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potent...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2