StudyDesign 05116
StudyDesign 05116
@research-05116

StudyDesign 05116 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 0 / Replies: 26
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 8 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, pote...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 39 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-29027

List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · RESEARCH-28221

Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-27076

Case 14 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Summary draft for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the answer addresse...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 142 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · correction exercise Correction note for “A literature note that separates hy...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-24631

Case 14 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point b...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · RESEARCH-23358

State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 25 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Reader check for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-20770

Correction note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: retain the wording beginning “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” in...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-19593

Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Summary draft for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the answer a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · RESEARCH-18643

Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · RESEARCH-17276

Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-16049

Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Correction note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: retain the wording beginning “Ask ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-14915

Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answer addresses “List materials, measurement conditions, controls an...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2