EvidenceTable 05114 · Member profile
Case 39 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the a...
Describe the measurement, population or model, units and uncertainty shown. Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the evidence, not in place of it...
Case 14 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wordin...
Case 142 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · correction exercise Method note for “A literature note that separates hypoth...
Case 14 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible A subgroup finding was not the primary planned analysis. How should it be summarised? ...
Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...
Case 25 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · source wording exercise Correction note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparis...
Method note for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: use “Link both versions, record dates and check whether…” as a row heading in a proposed ...
Case 4 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly Limit of the answer in “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: “Report...
Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and reassess claims that relied on the paper. Do not leave the historical citation look...
Case 2 — Comparing laboratory methods across years Method note for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: use “Ask whether assay, instrument, un...
Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions wit...
Case 49 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · comparison exercise Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: ...