EvidenceTable 05084 · Member profile

Case 6 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “I...

Case 7 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Method note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: ...

Case 36 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · source wording exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample...

Case 10 — A correction log for an archive article Limit of the answer in “A correction log for an archive article”: “Identify the original error and t...

Case 138 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · correction exercise A comparison table places chromatographic purit...

Case 9 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Correction note for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary ...

Correction note for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: retain the wording beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…”...

Case 21 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source refere...

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

Method note for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: use “Record the original units and axis transformation, show any conversion…” as...

Case 32 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Data provenance: keep source, ...

Reader check for “A correction log for an archive article”: distinguish the discussion point “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date...