MethodsReader 05041 · Member profile
Case 29 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...
Case 27 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in a...
Clarification for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: the point beginning “Keep the source citation, retrieval date an...
Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Association does not identify direction or causation, and…” as a row heading in a...
Case 5 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginnin...
Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...
Case 33 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Summary draft for “A correction log for an archive article”: the answer ad...
Limit of the answer in “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together”: “Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a…” is an exc...
Case 4 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, pote...
Case 131 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · correction exercise Reader check for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an a...
Case 3 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods Limit of the answer in “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: “Identify populat...
Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: retain the wording beginning “Keep speculation explicitly labelled...
Case 15 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exc...
Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...