StudyDesign 05036 · Member profile
Case 5 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Ask whether the changed figure affects the archive’s interpretation. Updating a citati...
Case 33 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise Method note for “A correction log for an archive article”: use “Keep the c...
Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: use “Describe the measurement, population or model,…” as a row heading ...
Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...
Case 3 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”...
Case 131 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · correction exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an ...
Case 2 — Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error Summary draft for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the answer address...
Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation”: the answer addresses “State the study design and what was actually m...
Case 14 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: u...
Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Locate the primary study and confirm that it...
Case 46 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the p...
Case 26 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answe...
Case 25 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · source wording exercise Reader check for “Reference management: distinguis...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records…” is an ex...