UnitsCheck 05009
UnitsCheck 05009
@research-05009

UnitsCheck 05009 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 22
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 31 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-28200

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27074

Use a comparison-status column: directly comparable, comparable with stated qualifications, or not established. Explain the reason for each label.

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 127 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise Method note for “Reference management: distinguish pr...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-24627

Limit of the answer in “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: “Put the species or model, design, comparator and…” is an exc...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-23331

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 10 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all p...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-20739

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19586

Case 42 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18633

Case 22 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-17271

Case 22 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly A result is described only as statistically significant. What information is missing? ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-16026

Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answer addresses “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals chang...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · RESEARCH-14890

Link both versions, record dates and check whether methods or conclusions changed. Publication status is useful context but is not itself a guarantee ...

5 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-13622

Case 34 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: ...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2