SourceIndex 05007
SourceIndex 05007
@research-05007

SourceIndex 05007 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 4 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30724

Case 3 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observatio...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-30288

Case 3 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Keep the original reported values beside any reformatted presentation. ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 30 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Reader check for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: distinguis...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-29008

Clarification for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”: the point beginning “Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable rec...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-27074

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 127 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · correction exercise A review cites another review for a claim about an ex...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-24627

Clarification for “Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract?”: the point beginning “Put the species or model, design, comparator ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-23331

Put the species or model, design, comparator and measured endpoint before the interpretation. The reader should be able to see what was observed witho...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21920

Case 10 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Clarification for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: the point beginning...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-20739

Was the analysis prespecified or exploratory, and how was uncertainty reported? Record what the paper states and mark unreported fields instead of ass...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19586

Case 42 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise A cited article now has an editorial notice. How should the a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-18633

Case 22 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Limit of the answer in “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-17271

Case 21 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Correction note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: retai...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-16026

Limit of the answer in “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed…” is an excer...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2