ArchiveReader 05005 · Member profile
Case 30 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the answe...
Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...
Case 126 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · correction exercise Summary draft for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the ...
Check the primary paper, supplementary material and any publisher correction. A review article can help locate sources, but it is not a substitute for...
An apparent difference can motivate a method question without proving that either laboratory is wrong. The appropriate next step is clarification from...
Case 10 — An evidence table with room for negative findings How can a reading table avoid highlighting only positive outcomes? Exercise RESEARCH-21920...
Case 41 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...
Case 22 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Clarification for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Case 21 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “List...
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...
Method note for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: use “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” as a row heading in a prop...
Case 33 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together · source wording exercise Reader check for “Data provenance: keep source, t...