StudyDesign 04776 · Member profile
Case 11 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and second...
Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...
Limit of the answer in “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: “Separate document provenance, identity, purity and…” is...
Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the original error and the corrected text, date…” belongs t...
Case 94 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · documentation exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates hy...
Case 17 — A correction log for an archive article Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep th...
Case 25 — Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep ...
Case 22 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report s...
Case 9 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication A cited preprint has a later published version. How should an archive entry handle the relationship...
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Case 12 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and outpu...
Correction note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: retain the wording beginning “A forum comparison cannot diagno...
Case 1 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study cond...