MethodsReader 04731 · Member profile
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Describe the measurement, population or model,…”...
Case 46 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise Reader check for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: distin...
Case 7 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Limit of the answer in “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: “Li...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 39 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 87 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · documentation exercise Summary draft for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the an...
Case 10 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...
Case 19 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation An animal experiment is cited as though it establishes a human outcome. What qualification is ...
Case 15 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Summary draft for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the answe...
Case 2 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note ...
Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.
The index should list supplied evidence and missing evidence separately. Use method-specific wording rather than a blanket verified or safe label.