StudyDesign 04726
StudyDesign 04726
@research-04726

StudyDesign 04726 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 23
Reply
RE: Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · RESEARCH-30256

Discuss who chose to post, missing outcomes, unverifiable records and changes in reporting over time. Such material can suggest questions but cannot e...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-29861

Case 7 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: A correction log that survives the next archive update · RESEARCH-28948

Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the next archive update”: “Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction…” is ...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28150

Case 39 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Method note for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty ...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-27003

Separate the authors’ proposed mechanism from the measurements that support it. A plausible explanation is not automatically a demonstrated pathway.

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 87 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · documentation exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their treat...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-24597

Case 10 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describes it as an established cli...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-23256

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference-table workshop: comparable quantities and missing context · RESEARCH-21884

Case 18 — A correction log for an archive article Clarification for “A correction log for an archive article”: the point beginning “Identify the origi...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-20722

Case 15 — A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation Expand it on first use and name the discipline and source context. Add a cross-refere...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-19586

Case 1 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? The summary should say that different quantities were initially mixed a...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-18602

Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation · RESEARCH-17232

Clarification for “A durable glossary entry for an ambiguous abbreviation”: the point beginning “Expand it on first use and name the…” belongs to the ...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16019

Case 5 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and seconda...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: An evidence table with room for negative findings · RESEARCH-14825

Method note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: use “Include all prespecified outcomes where reported, null…” as a row heading in...

5 years ago
Page 1 / 2