StudyDesign 04716 · Member profile
Case 38 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise A protocol summary omits conditions and controls. What mak...
Case 43 — An evidence table with room for negative findings · source wording exercise Reader check for “An evidence table with room for negative findi...
Case 85 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured · documentation exercise Correction note for “Research figure captions: tell the...
Case 8 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...
Keep the source citation, retrieval date and a record of conversions or exclusions. Make synthetic examples explicit and never combine them silently w...
Case 16 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the ans...
Case 13 — Data provenance: keep source, transformation and output together Correction note for “Data provenance: keep source, transformation and outpu...
Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...
Clarification for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: the point beginning “Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who…” bel...
Case 4 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study cond...
Locate the primary study and confirm that it measured the claimed outcome. Record when only a secondary account was accessible and avoid presenting it...
Method note for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: use “Retain units, method, laboratory interval and collection cont...
Case 47 — Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication · source wording exercise Clarification for “Preprint versus peer-reviewed publication”: the point...