MethodsReader 04681 · Member profile
Clarification for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: the point beginning “Interpretive discussion belongs alongside the ev...
Case 33 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise Clarification for “A literature note that separates h...
Case 39 — A correction log for an archive article · source wording exercise A transcription error changes the units in a figure caption. How should th...
Case 80 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · documentation exercise Correction note for “Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample”...
Case 3 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Limit of the answer in “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: “Explain the study’s scope ...
Clarification for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly”: the point beginning “Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcom...
Case 11 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Summary draft for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation...
Case 8 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Correction note for “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: retain the wording...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Clarification for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”: the point beginning “Describe the species, model and…” belongs to the question as w...
Method note for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: use “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record its date and…” as a...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the point beginning “List materials, measurement conditions, controls and...