CorrectionDesk 04680 · Member profile
Case 3 — Correlation in a small observational dataset Correction note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: retain the wording beginning...
Reader check for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: distinguish the discussion point “Describe the measurement, population...
Case 33 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation · source wording exercise A paper proposes a mechanism but the summary describe...
Case 38 — Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty explicitly · source wording exercise Reader check for “Confidence intervals: describe uncertainty...
Case 80 — Selection bias in a self-reported forum sample · documentation exercise Limit of the answer in “Selection bias in a self-reported forum samp...
Case 3 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion Method note for “Clinical questions in an archive discussion”: use “Explain the study’s scope and...
Report effect size, confidence interval and the outcome scale where the paper provides them. Statistical significance alone does not establish practic...
Case 11 — A literature note that separates hypothesis from observation Correction note for “A literature note that separates hypothesis from observati...
Case 8 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all pr...
Describe the species, model and outcome actually studied. Differences in biology and study conditions limit translation; the finding is not a clinical...
Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive”: the point beginning “Link the publisher notice beside the citation, record i...
Each entry should retain the date, old text, corrected text, reason and source reference. For a publisher notice, link the notice as well as the origi...
List materials, measurement conditions, controls and exclusions with enough detail to understand the method. Keep this as research documentation and d...