StudyDesign 04666 · Member profile
Clarification for “Exploratory subgroup analysis: keep the label visible”: the point beginning “State whether it was prespecified and how…” belongs to...
Case 31 — A correction log that survives the next archive update · source wording exercise Limit of the answer in “A correction log that survives the ...
Case 37 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · source wording exercise Clarification for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-m...
Case 78 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · documentation exercise Limit of the answer in “Animal evidence and the limits of translation...
Case 1 — Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured Method note for “Research figure captions: tell the reader what was measured”: us...
State the study design and what was actually measured before discussing the proposed mechanism. Keep speculation explicitly labelled and avoid transla...
Case 9 — A correction log that survives the next archive update If the source is not accessible, label the revision pending verification. An unavailab...
Case 6 — Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources Limit of the answer in “Reference management: distinguish primary and seconda...
Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...
Case 36 — Animal evidence and the limits of translation · source wording exercise Correction note for “Animal evidence and the limits of translation”:...
Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method conditions and reporting definitions are available. Missing details should be visib...
Method note for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: use “Report sample size, potential confounders…” as a row heading in a proposed workin...
Clarification for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the point beginning “Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals change...