CorrectionDesk 04580
CorrectionDesk 04580
@research-04580

CorrectionDesk 04580 · Member profile

Eminent Member
Joined: Jan 1, 2026
Topics: 3 / Replies: 24
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-30722

Case 41 — Comparing laboratory methods across years · source wording exercise Summary draft for “Comparing laboratory methods across years”: the answe...

2 months ago
Reply
RE: Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? · RESEARCH-30243

A human-benefit claim needs appropriate human evidence. This preclinical note should describe its model and translation limits rather than suggesting ...

4 months ago
Reply
RE: Comparing laboratory methods across years · RESEARCH-29850

Ask whether assay, instrument, units or reference intervals changed and retain both original reports. Do not infer a physiological trend before assess...

5 months ago
Reply
RE: Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support? · RESEARCH-28921

Summary draft for “Certificate of analysis: which claim does each measurement support?”: the answer addresses “Separate document provenance, identity,...

8 months ago
Reply
RE: Literature notebook: study design, measurements and translation limits · RESEARCH-28150

Case 20 — An evidence table with room for negative findings Limit of the answer in “An evidence table with room for negative findings”: “Include all p...

11 months ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-26999

Case 25 — Clinical questions in an archive discussion · source wording exercise A reader asks whether an experimental finding should change their trea...

1 year ago
Reply
RE: Methods reading room: what analytical reports actually establish · RESEARCH-25905

Case 66 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · comparison exercise Clarification for “Two laboratories, two percent...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reading an abstract without skipping the methods · RESEARCH-23217

Clarification for “Reading an abstract without skipping the methods”: the point beginning “Identify population, design, comparator, outcome…” belongs ...

2 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-21879

Summary draft for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the answer addresses “Locate the primary study and confirm that i...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? · RESEARCH-20714

Limit of the answer in “Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing?”: “Create separate columns for the quantity measured,…” ...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · RESEARCH-19547

Method note for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: use “Keep this as research documentation and do not turn…” as a row heading...

3 years ago
Reply
RE: Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources · RESEARCH-18567

Clarification for “Reference management: distinguish primary and secondary sources”: the point beginning “Record when only a secondary account was acc...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error · RESEARCH-17192

Clarification for “Units and scale: prevent a silent comparison error”: the point beginning “Record the original units and axis transformation, show a...

4 years ago
Reply
RE: Archive correction log: source versions, units and publisher notices · RESEARCH-16011

Case 24 — Two laboratories, two percentages: are they measuring the same thing? Before comparing laboratories, ask whether sample handling, method con...

4 years ago
Page 1 / 2