UnitsCheck 04479 · Member profile

Clarification for “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: the point beginning “Report sample size, potential confounders…” belongs to the ques...

Case 7 — A correction log that survives the next archive update Keep a visible correction near the affected material and a linked changelog entry. Rea...

Case 11 — Reading an abstract without skipping the methods A strong abstract conclusion is being discussed without the study methods. What should the ...

Case 51 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion · comparison exercise Reader check for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method...

Identify the original error and the corrected text, date the correction and link the source. Keep the correction visible to readers who may have saved...

Use separate entries for the internal transcription correction and the publisher notice. They have different sources and may affect different claims.

Limit of the answer in “Correlation in a small observational dataset”: “Report sample size, potential confounders…” is an excerpt from the discussion,...

Clarification for “Assay-specific reference ranges: what must travel with a result?”: the point beginning “Retain units, method, laboratory interval a...

Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answer addresses “List materials, measurement conditions, controls an...

Case 9 — Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion Summary draft for “Reproducibility checklist for a bench-method discussion”: the answ...

Case 13 — Reading a preclinical paper: what belongs beside the abstract? The draft summary of a fictional reading exercise moves from an animal-model ...

Case 44 — Retractions and expressions of concern in an archive · source wording exercise Clarification for “Retractions and expressions of concern in ...

Explain the study’s scope and limitations without recommending a treatment change. Individual decisions belong with a qualified clinician who can asse...